February 4, 2008 11:17 AM
I have no doubt that bigger motors aren't the real need. It's bigger wheels, and the ground clearance they provide. The motors are the answer to the extra power needed to handle the bigger wheels. Notice I talked about a whole new base spliced into the exsting Rovio motor control. I also admitted I had no clue what upsizing options there were for the omniwheels.
As to why I'd want a more rugged platform, it's because I'm getting a wee bit tired of robots that can't transition from hardwood to low pile, to medium pile carpeting. A fair number of RC cars are useless on anything other than pavement.
I expect Rovio will be much better at varied terrain than RSV2, but I expect that I couldn't send it down the driveway to fetch the newspaper.
I share your concerns about the omni-wheels being able to handle obstacles. In a four wheel system going in a straight line, the efficient thing to do is to align two wheels with the direction of travel and have the other two side slipping perpendicular to the travel. That's fine until you run into that broomstick that's fallen across the path.
I don't know how well the two driving wheels will be able to push the sideslipping wheels up and over the obstacle. Some obstacle handling behaviors might be needed to have the robot "spin" over a low obstacle, rather than try to take it on in a straight shot.
Perhaps something like lining one wheel up ready to roll over the obstacle, then doing a translating spiral rotation to have one wheel at a time climb over the obstacle as the robot moves forward as it rotates.
ScottE -- Member (always) & Moderator (when needed)